Why Did Bitcoin Surge Against the Ruble?
  Insights, news and analysis for the professional investor March 6, 2022 Supported by  Prices as of 3/6/22 @ 12:00 p.m. UTC Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here.
Welcome to Crypto Long & Short.
So much happens every week in crypto and the main narrative shifts daily. Somehow, that has sped up recently and we haven't really had much time to take a break and sit back. A couple of weeks ago we were talking about transaction censorability, last week we were talking about privacy and this week we were talking about bitcoin finally acting like a store of value – until Friday, when it started trading like a tech stock again.
For this week's newsletter, I wanted to provide you with a barrage of data and graphs focused on Russia and Ukraine that sorta kinda suggest that bitcoin is helping regular people potentially store their wealth in these uncertain times.
That (and maybe more) below...
– George Kaloudis, research analyst
 Buy bitcoin and 100+ cryptocurrencies with 20+ fiat currencies. New users can enjoy 0% credit/debit card fees on all crypto purchases made in their first 30 days. Download the Crypto.com App now.
Last Tuesday, bitcoin (BTC) hit an all-time high measured in rubles (RUB). Does that really mean anything?
Price feeds don't tell the full story when comparing asset prices across different currencies, especially when one of those currencies is issued by a country facing financial sanctions for invading Ukraine (and the other is magic internet money).  A quick look at USD/RUB tells most of the story. One U.S. dollar was worth 84 rubles on Friday, Feb. 25 and over 114 rubles on Tuesday, March 1. With that type of devaluation, you might reasonably expect many assets priced in rubles to hit all-time highs soon, especially if the trend continues.  However, the ruble losing 37% of its U.S. dollar value would explain something around a 37% gain in "bitcoin in ruble" (USD and its stablecoin equivalents represent the most used trading pair for bitcoin, so this is an OK assumption). It wouldn't immediately explain why bitcoin gained more than 55% (from 3.2 million to 4.9 million rubles); the excess gain suggests there was some other demand factor at play. Plus, the USD price of bitcoin is still more than 50% off of all-time highs.
Where is the demand coming from? Depending on which parts of Crypto Twitter you frequent, on your familiarity with the history of cryptocurrency, your political leanings, your general level of cynicism or your insistence on being a Luddite, you might have one of two different hypotheses about what is going on:
Between the two, the latter is more likely than the former. Anecdotal stories and "what-ifs" suggest masses can pile into bitcoin to preserve wealth as their countries go to war, while Bitcoin's transparent ledger is not going to do Vladimir Putin's government any favors in avoiding sanctions (as we mentioned in last week's newsletter).
These conversations are fun to have, but it may not be regular people either. This is a global asset after all.
Let's see what the data says.
The data  Additional data from Binance shows the volume of the BTC/RUB trading pair spiked more than 240% above the 30-day trailing average in RUB terms on Feb. 28 and more than 400% on Feb. 24.  With these two data points in mind, it makes sense to then look at the types of bitcoin holders that may have emerged to figure out if these are new holders or something different. Noelle Acheson (former CoinDesker and former author of Crypto Long & Short) posted a great tweet thread outlining the exercise that she, I and a lot of people in the industry went through last week. It's long, but it's certainly worth reading in full if you have time. I'll summarize here.
First, we consider the number of bitcoin addresses that are holding ≥ $1. There was an uptick from 34,564,788 to 35,035,127 from Feb. 27 to March 1. Digging in further here, the number of Bitcoin addresses that were holding > 1,000 bitcoin also ticked up from 2,121 to 2,257 over the same period. While the general growth in addresses supports the idea that regular people are coming into Bitcoin, the growth in addresses with > 1,000 BTC (> $40 million) does not. 
 Digging a bit deeper here. Glassnode has an unreleased metric in its product offering called the "Wallet Cohort Trend Accumulation Score,'' which breaks down the size of wallets which are accumulating bitcoin. According to their most recent chart on Feb. 27, smaller holders have been the most aggressive in accumulating bitcoin.
So that's great, regular people are getting bitcoin. But how do we explain the increase in the amount of larger addresses? From Noelle's tweet thread:
But a look at the total amount of BTC held in these addresses actually declined, suggesting that this was more likely to be a case of exchange wallet reshuffling.
The corresponding data is shown below and this view is generally corroborated across the industry.  All of this supports what bitcoiners have been saying for a while now – bitcoin is not being used by warmongers to avoid sanctions (for now). Instead, I think it is more likely that it is being used by regular people hoping to preserve wealth as war rages on.
However, there isn't a consensus yet. Citigroup analysts said the following, citing a chart showing bitcoin purchases in RUB rising in absolute bitcoin terms to around 450 BTC:
Russian volumes have been relatively small so far, suggesting that the price action is more due to investors positioning for an expected uptick in demand from Russia, rather than Russian demand itself.
This is a good point. People like making money even in the face of tragedy (just check out the spike in donations to Ukraine after the government confirmed, and then unconfirmed, an airdrop of new tokens to donors). In the end, this could just be traders taking positions in anticipation of increased demand.
Time will tell.
 Off-exchange settlement in a trustless trading environment means unleashing maximum capital efficiency and more aggressive investment strategies.
ClearLoop brings Copper's custody and leading digital asset exchanges into one secure trading loop where funds are delegated, not moved. Balances are immediately available for trading and settlement is instant, with capital ready to be redeployed in milliseconds.
ClearLoop is the institutional investor's unfair advantage, offering greater control during high volatility while mitigating counterparty risk.
Takeaways Chair of the Federal Reserve Jerome Powell doubled down on interest rate hikes amidst Russia's invasion of Ukraine. TAKEAWAY: Investors may have been overconfident in the assumption that war was going to back the Federal Reserve away from rate hikes. Powell signaled that combating inflation was a top priority and that the initial plan is still being followed carefully.
Centralization issues within crypto's infrastructure as Infura and OpenSea block users from certain areas of the world. TAKEAWAY: While Infura cleared the air about widespread user blacklisting, the event highlighted over-reliance on centralized entities within the crypto space. All end users are still able to access blockchains via running a full node, but centralized infrastructure providers currently play a large role in lowering technical barriers.
Crypto and equity markets reacted poorly to Russia's invasion of Ukraine as the world fears impending sanctions and potential war. TAKEAWAY: Bitcoin fell below $35,000 early Thursday morning, as reports of Russia's invasion hit the news. However, crypto and equity markets snapped back to the upside with bitcoin quickly regaining $38,000 and the S&P 500 ending trading hours up on the day.
Ukraine officials promised and canceled an airdrop for crypto addresses that donated to the country's defense effort. TAKEAWAY: Ukraine's defense fund saw a spike in donations after a country official announced an impending snapshot and token airdrop. However, after feedback and criticism government officials backed away from the plan and canceled the airdrop. Ukraine's Ethereum address has received over $39 million from 74,000 donors.
Digital Currency Group authorized a $250 million buyback of its Grayscale trusts trading at a discount to market value. TAKEAWAY: As spot crypto ETFs continue to be denied, Grayscale looks for ways to combat the discount seen in many of its crypto trusts. After trading at a premium to Net Asset Value early last year, Grayscale Bitcoin Trust is now trading more than 25% below market value. CoinDesk and Grayscale are both subsidiaries of Digital Currency Group.
– Teddy Oosterbaan, research analyst
Podcasts Worth Listening To  A check-in on crypto's institutional narrative.
Zoltan Pozsar on Russia, Gold, and a Turning Point for the U.S. Dollar The Credit Suisse strategist breaks down this extraordinary moment.
Where Crypto Fits in Wealth Management The big opportunities for the wealth management industry in the coming months.
Crypto Long & Short A newsletter from CoinDesk Were you forwarded this newsletter? Sign up here. Copyright © 2022 CoinDesk, All rights reserved. 250 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10003, USA |
