Crypto.com Hacker Is Laundering $15M
  The biggest crypto news and ideas of the day Jan. 18, 2022 If you were forwarded this newsletter and would like to receive it, sign up here. Sponsored by  Welcome to The Node.
Questions? Feedback? We'd love to hear from you – simply reply to this email.
Today's must-reads Top Shelf  DIRTY LAUNDRY: Crypto.com, which froze withdrawals yesterday, announced that someone hacked the platform for $15 million in ether (4,600 ETH). This money is now being laundered through Ethereum mixer Tornado Cash in batches of 1,000 ETH, according to security consultancy PeckShield. Separately, sophisticated coders have stolen about $1.4 million in crypto from Multichain users who failed to update their accounts, despite a warning. Decentralized finance security firm Dedaub found a loophole in the crypto platform's code, which Multichain announced along with a fix and a call to action apparently unheeded by some.
LONG-TIME DEVELOPMENTS: Block, formerly known as Square, is integrating the Lightning Network into its popular Cash App so users can send BTC without fees. The company said the feature should be available to all U.S. Cash App users, except those in New York state, in the coming weeks. CEO Jack Dorsey, a Lightning Labs investor, announced his intention to integrate Lightning three years ago. Separately, Intel, one of the world's largest chip makers, is said to be developing an "ultra low volume" bitcoin mining chip.
FUNDING THE METAVERSE: Animoca Brands, a metaverse investor with holdings in 150 NFT-related projects, raised ~$360 million at a valuation of $5.5 billion. Liberty City Ventures, Winklevoss Capital, Soros Fund Management and 10T Holdings contributed to the latest round, just three months after it raised $65 million at a $2.2 billion valuation. Separately, Solana's answer to NFT juggernaut OpenSea, Metaplex, raised $46 million in a round led by Multicoin Capital and Jump Crypto. The capital will go towards grants for underrepresented communities.
EURO SCENE: BXM Operations, a firm founded by the CEO and chief financial officer of crypto trading platform BitMEX, plans to purchase Bankhaus von der Heydt, a German bank founded in 1754 that offers crypto services. Elsewhere, London-based VC Blossom Capital has raised a $432 million fund to invest in crypto and European tech startups. Blossom III would be the largest Series A fund in Europe, with one-third earmarked for crypto. Finally, Bank of America said a U.K. central bank digital currency (CBDC) – "Britcoin" – would replace checking accounts.
A message from Nexo  Grow your wealth securely with Nexo's high-yield interest account. Earn up to 17% interest on your crypto, including BTC, ETH, LTC, stablecoins and more, paid out daily. With full flexibility to add or withdraw assets at any time without losing your accrued interest.
Get instant access to the interest earned and up to $375M guaranteed insurance for all your digital assets by our industry-renowned custodians. No fees or lock-in periods.
Over 2.5M+ people worldwide are already using the Nexo platform – so you definitely don't want to miss out. Your Nexo account is less than a minute away – just top up and you'll start earning interest instantly. No further action is required from your side.
Overheard on CoinDesk TV... Sound Bites  "Algorithmic stablecoins, which don't present systemic risk to the banking system because they don't touch fiat, probably don't make sense under that regulatory regime."
–Former Acting Comptroller of the Currency and current Bitfury CEO Brian Brooks, on CoinDesk TV's "First Mover."
What others are writing... Off-Chain Signals 
A message from Kaiko  Kaiko is the premier cryptocurrency market data provider for investors and enterprises. Our data services enable seamless connectivity to historical and live data feeds from 100+ centralized and decentralized exchanges.
Request a free trial, browse our data dictionary, and subscribe to our weekly research newsletter today!
Putting the news in perspective The Takeaway  Is Crypto a Ponzi? Define 'Ponzi' If you can believe it, scams and Ponzi schemes have existed and thrived in the cryptocurrency industry well before the recent speculative exuberance around decentralized finance (DeFi), non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and token launches on blockchains like Binance Smart Chain. For sure there are a lot of sketchy "profile pic" projects (PFPs) and questionable economic games played using smart contracts, those lines of code that supposedly cut out the middlemen from basic financial services. So, you know, do your own research.
Thankfully, some crypto projects make it easy for you. In 2014, Ponzi.io launched. It promised to pay 1.2 times capital gains paid in bitcoin on deposits as little as 0.0001 BTC. "Get rich off the world's first open Ponzi scheme!" the project's website advertised. To say nothing else about it, Ponzi.io is guilty of false and deceptive marketing; it wasn't even the first self-evident Ponzi.
Just as these schemes have long thrived in crypto, there have also been commentators willing to go out on a limb, risking libel and alpha returns, to dismiss the entire blockchain-based industry as fraudulent. Last month, Robert McCauley, an economist at Boston University, wrote an op-ed stating, "Bitcoin is worse than a Madoff-style Ponzi scheme."
His case? People buy bitcoin with the expectation of a profit. Because bitcoin is a "zero-coupon perpetual" rather than a "income-generating" digital asset, the only way to profit is to "cash out" to someone else – the salutary greater fool. Bitcoin is worse than your everyday pump-and-dump penny stocks for McCauley. If the economic project fails, it's not just zero-sum for investors who lose their money, but "negative-sum" for society because of bitcoin's steep power bill.
Still, you can't fault the man for using the P-word. Major crypto media companies, "thought leaders" and informed users of crypto platforms often throw it around. Hardcore bitcoiners have called everything from BitPay to Brave "scams" simply for trying to get people to spend their bitcoin or earn crypto for using a browser. That "Ponzi" has been picked up by critics as a cudgel is crypto's own doing.
See also: NFT Scams: How to Avoid Falling Victim
"You're using the term 'Ponzi' to mean an economic game with built-in investing incentives & high risk of implosion," he said. "When regulators hear 'Ponzi,' they think it means a fraudulent scheme in which a criminal deceives victims to steal their money.
"This term is doing massive damage," Chervinsky tweeted Monday.
With all due respect to the newly hired policy lead, I think the term is actually a useful heuristic for describing much of this industry's activity. As Chervinsky notes, crypto projects are "Ponzi-like" in that they often incentivize early participation in a project with the promise of a return. That's a broad definition, but these behavioral incentives are widespread.
As a reporter, I find that there is value in speaking with economy, clarity and honesty. "Ponzinomics" is a term that has come up in the industry, that people have have come to use flippantly, because it accurately captures much of what goes on.
There should absolutely be more of an effort to draw a distinction between actual scams and legitimate efforts, but the term is what it is and, again, there shouldn't be language policing of free markets. I advocate the use of softer words: "Ponzi-like" or "Ponzi-esque."
"Ponzi scheme" has a well-established definition. As McCauley noted, in 1920, Charles Ponzi guaranteed 50% returns on 45-day investments. Early investors profited from fresh incoming capital before the entire plot collapsed less than a year in. Bernie Madoff ran the same game, the longest-such scheme we can all agree on, before the Great Recession hit and redemptions halted. The key is that there no legitimate economic activity, just a scam that tries to build a perpetual-motion machine.
DeFi protocols like Ohm, which "Ohmies" described as a Ponzi, are based on continuing adoption, a constant stream of money. But it was also trying to build a new "backbone" for DeFi. The term use of Ponzi was self-conscious – it gets directly at the greed needed to prop the project up – for the latent "network effects" to take hold.
I like the term because it's frank and because I recognize how it has evolved – as language always does – to connote a broader range of activity. Pseudonymous host of the "Crypto Critic" podcast Cas Piancey (someone I hope I'm on good terms with) took offense when CoinDesk's stalwart DeFi reporter Andrew Thurman (a friend) used the term to describe both Ohm and the U.S. dollar.
Crypto, apart from the flat-out scams, will always have a free-floating price mechanism because these assets trade in free markets rather than in a financial black box designed by a Madoff or Ponzi. So, early investors don't necessarily profit – like Satoshi who left his coins untouched or the many paper hands who sold too soon. Later investors can buy at an "advantaged position," or lower price and profits are not paid out solely on the backs of new investors.
Ponzinomic as an adjectives has cultural "currency" because it shows how crypto is speculative, a gamble, a "game of chicken," to use Franek's phrase, but it's not an outright declaration that "crypto is a Ponzi scheme."
Does that bastardize the definition? Does it normalize undesirable market activity? Might people get hurt later on? Insofar as we're speaking plainly and accurately, like Ponzi.io calling itself Ponzi.io, then you only have yourself to blame for missing out, or missing big.
The Chaser... 
The Node A newsletter from CoinDesk Were you forwarded this newsletter? Sign up here. Copyright © 2021 CoinDesk, All rights reserved. 250 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10003, USA Manage your newsletter subscriptions | Unsubscribe from all CoinDesk email |
